Overview

The purpose of a witness statement in the Undercover Policing Inquiry has one of two functions. 

The first is to support an application or submissions being made on a point; this is usually when the Inquiry is dealing with procedural or preliminary issues, though they are not as common there.

Witness statements can often come with exhibits, which are pieces of evidence supporting a point or claim being made in the statement, such as contemporary photos and diaries, and provide evidence of the statement’s accuracy (or simply provide context).

The second, more common variety is the evidential form, where a core participant or witness provides evidence to the Inquiry in order to meet its terms of reference. See under Witnesses for more details.

If there is more than one witness statement by an individual they are denoted by numbers, e.g. 1st Witness Statement of …, 2nd Witness Statement of … 

The Inquiry usually publishes the witness statements it receives, but not always. Some are redacted for sensitive or personal information. 

Though witness statements are legal documents and carry a statement of truth, the Inquiry permits public statements to be issued in the nominal or pseudonym of the person being used in the Inquiry when an anonymity order has been issued in their favour.

A protocol has been published by the Inquiry setting out how it expects witness statements to be done.

Procedural

Date
Title
Document Type
Topic
Fourth Witness Statement of Alan Pughsley
Witness Statement
Restriction order approach, Generic restriction order documents, Photographs
Fourth Witness Statement of Donal O’Driscoll
Witness Statement
Anonymity, Photographs
Witness Statement of Mary (NSCP)
Witness Statement
Anonymity
Witness Statement Protocol
Protocol
General
Third Witness Statement of Donal O’Driscoll
Witness Statement
Restriction order approach
Witness Statement of Brian Healy re: restriction order application of HN14 Jim Boyling
re: restriction order application of HN14 Jim Boyling
Witness Statement
Anonymity
Witness Statement of Louise Meade
Witness Statement
Anonymity
Witness Statement of Geoff Bluemel
Witness Statement
Restriction order approach, Generic restriction order documents
Extracts of statement of Alan Pughsley for NPCC made 27 September 2017
As relied on by the Metropolitan Police Service in support of anonymity applications
Witness Statement
Anonymity, Restriction order approach
Christopher Farrimond – Gist of Witness Statement
Witness Statement
Restriction order approach, Generic restriction order documents
Third Witness Statement of Cairo
Witness Statement
Restriction order approach, Generic restriction order documents
First Witness Statement of Cairo
Witness Statement
Anonymity
Fifth Update Note
Update
Strategic Review, Anonymity, Costs
Second Witness Statement of Alistair Pocock
On the structuring and querying of IMOS
Witness Statement
Assurance
Second Witness Statement of Neil Cox
Witness Statement
Assurance
Third Witness Statement of Michael Killeen
Witness Statement
Assurance
Witness Statement of Kenneth Neale
Witness Statement
Assurance
Second Witness Statement of Jeffrey Lamprey
Witness Statement
Assurance
First Witness Statement of Donal O’Driscoll
Witness Statement
Anonymity
Second Witness Statement of Neil Hutchison
Witness Statement
Assurance
Fifth Witness Statement of Neil Hutchison
Witness Statement
Anonymity
First Witness Statement of Neil Hutchison
Witness Statement
Assurance
Witness Statement of Harriet Wistrich
Impact statement on behalf of Birnberg Peirce Clients (Category H)
Witness Statement, Impact Statement
Anonymity
Witness Statement of Paddy McGuinness on ‘Neither Confirm Nor Deny’
Witness Statement
Restriction order approach, Neither Confirm Nor Deny